Anti-Gravity

                                 By: Tsegazeab Beteselassie




Anti-gravity: One way an anti-gravity machine might work, by Dr.Yevgeny Podkletnov.
Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2159487.stm

    "What is anti-gravity*?", you might ask. Well, to put in on simple terms, anti-gravity is, well, the opposite of gravity. It is supposed to be a pushing force, but if you read my last post, (if you want to read it, click here) gravity is a pushing force. Then wouldn't anti-gravity be a pulling force? I have no idea. But if I am correct and anti-gravity is a pulling force, then there would have to be another force acting upon anti-gravity. As I mentioned in my last post, neutrinos push two objects together. Then wouldn't anti-neutrinos (I'm only calling them anti- because I don't know what they are made of, not because they are made of antimatter) push things apart? I don't know about that either. But if that was correct, then there must be at least twice the amount of matter we thought was in the universe. But there is a problem. Wouldn't gravity in a massive object be slowed down with all those anti-neutrinos?

 

    So, the problem is, that, with all those anti-neutrinos buzzing about, wouldn't they actually slow down gravity to make it as weak as it is today? Because in the grand unified theory (G.U.T, for short), gravity is actually the weakest of the 4 forces. So I think gravity is a lot more powerful, but with all those anti-neutrinos, it became very weak. So that means that if all these anti-neutrinos were taken off the universe's shoulders, gravity would either rip us apart (not to mention the whole universe), or make everything flop to the ground, unable to move. This might happen if those particles were gone. So we should be thankful for those particles. And there is also this new theory emerging about some "negative matter" that accounts for anti-gravity. And anti-neutrinos just might fit the bill.

 

    But what I'm not sure about is what if this was wrong. That would probably mean that anti-gravity wouldn't exist. And if they have a bit of anti-gravity technology today, then it's not anti-gravity there using and a whole lot of physicists will start searching for this new force, and they will have to make the grand unified theory include this new force, and basically, a lot of money would be spent. So I believe that anti-gravity does exist, because if it doesn't, wouldn't they prove it wrong by now?

 

* This post fit's in nicely with my last post doesn't it?

 

Email me at: tsegazeab12@gmail.com. Thank you.