Can you Create Matter?

                 
                                                 By: Tsegazeab Beteselassie



Big bang: What happened 13.77 billion years ago.

     Everybody knows you cannot create matter (and antimatter), right? Well some people might think, WRONG. But I have proof that you can't create matter even though it looks so obvious sometimes. "But," you might say, "what about the big bang?" "When the little atom exploded, it must have created matter." But it didn't. And I have proof. It is Einstein's theory, e=mc squared.

    First, let me tell you how that little atom that created the big bang came into existence. Sometimes, a quantum fluctuation makes an atom appear out of nowhere. "But", you say, "isn't that creating matter?" Well, no. Creating matter is making something from nothing. But that will break the laws of physics. And it is technically impossible to break the laws of physics. But I have a theory that there is a way to make something from nothing without breaking the laws of physics. Actually, I'm not actually making "something from nothing", but it's almost like that. I think there are little spots of energy in our universe and using the theory e=mc squared, the energy is moving very fast and at the point of the speed of light,(it looks like it stopped moving to an outside viewer) it turns into an atom and really stops moving. So back to the big bang theory.

    Before the big bang, there must have been a huge energy spot zipping around at 99% of the speed of light and then it reached the speed of light. Then, all this matter (and antimatter) was "created" and antimatter and matter tried to annihilate each other. "But" you say, "you can't destroy matter." Well, you can't. But since you cannot destroy matter (or antimatter by the way) that means the matter and antimatter went somewhere. There is a theory that the matter and antimatter actually go through each other and return back by gravity, back and forth, back and forth, back and forth for a long time. This happens if a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a thousandth of a second. Then, they merge into a heavier particle. Well anyways, matter won because a very heavy particle called a Q+ particle. 60% of the time, it decays into a proton and a neutrino, while 40% of the time, it decays into a positron and an antinutron. There is also another theory that an x-boson made of matter decays into one more particle than an x-boson of antimatter. This means matter and antimatter weren't actually destroyed in the big bang, only merged together into a heavier particle which will decay into a matter and antimatter particle and get merged again and so on. So matter (and antimatter) can't be destroyed. And the awnser to your question earlier is, no.

Email me at Tsegazeab12@gmail.com.
Thank you.

How to Build a Lightsaber

                      
                                                            By: Tsegazeab Beteselassie

Lightsaber: Two lightsabers clashing with each other.

    In Star Wars, there were heroes that battled evil villains with swords called lightsabers. Some brilliant scientists are thinking how to build one. And I think I know how. I know that a laser would be a very bad option for the blade of a lightsaber. The reason is because in order to be a true lightsaber, the swords have to clash. Unfortunately, a laser is just a light that that is contracted to a beam of electromagnetic energy. Two lasers would go through each other so you can not parry a blow from the enemy. However, the light saber's handle can hold a particle machine that stiffens the laser so that it can clash with another lightsaber. And also, a laser will disappear in daylight. The main problem is, however, that lasers can not be stopped. But you still need an energy source.

    A laser is harmless unless given enough energy and power to cut through things. You could  make a battery that stores enough energy to cut through things which is about 5 gigawatts of power (about enough energy to make plasma). Unfortunately, there is a problem. A battery is designed to store energy, not create energy. Eventually the battery will run out. And I don't think you'll find a 5 gigabyte battery anytime soon. However, if you make a fan on the end of the lightsaber that sucks in air and uses the energy of the particles (when cut open) to make a plasma laser, I think you have enough energy to make some plasma. But there is a problem.

    The problem with making plasma is that if you can't contain it, it will incinerate anything it touches. The energy source is in the handle right? The handle, however, can not be made of any metal because metal melts at 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Plasma is much hotter. It will boil the metal and what you have left, with no container, is superheated plasma. Bottom line: I'm pretty sure you don't want superheated plasma dripping down your skin. Fortunately, there is a solution.

    We can make the handle out of two materials called Beryllium and Tungsten. Add some Carbon and you can make a lightsaber handle that can withstand plasma. These three materials have extreme melting temperatures. They can withstand plasma for more than an hour. Of course, battles won't be as long as that unless going to war but it is good to have something that can withstand plasma for long periods of time. I know I am correct because there is more than one proof that it is good for a lightsaber handle. Scientists today are developing nuclear fusion but they need something that can withstand plasma. They used Carbon, Beryllium, and Tungsten to layer the nuclear reactor because of there ability to withstand plasma. There is also an experiment done with the three materials and some metal (nickel). They put all three in an oven and when  they came out, all were fine except the nickel which melted. I still think the main problem is the blade.

    I have a new plan for the design of the blade. The blade will also be made of Beryllium, Tungsten, and Carbon. The blade has an electromagnetic field when turned on to contain the plasma. When you turn the lightsaber on, the blade will extend to about three feet. The fan will suck in air and use it's energy to create a 5 gigabyte powered blade. The electromagnetic fields in the blade will hold the plasma together. The lightsabers blade will turn a certain color and you can clash with your opponent. This is my design for a lightsaber.

 Email me at: Tsegazeab12@gmail.com. 
Thank you.   

Bending the Fabric of Space-time Part 2

                        
                                                                         By: Tsegazeab Beteselassie




Space-time: The fabric of Space-time.

    The fabric of space-time is supposed to be two dimensional, right? Well, I don't think it's correct. Let's do this experiment to prove it. Raise to objects in the air. Then, place them so that one is higher than the other.  Even better, put one over the other without them touching each other. Then, imagine the fabric of space-time showing the gravity of the objects. You can pick to put them on top of each other, or put them so that one is higher than the other. If you did it correctly, Then you will see that the fabric of space time will have to warp in such a way that it can hold both. But the space-time fabric can't do that. That means we need a new theory on how the fabric of space-time is shaped.
 
    From the experiment, we now know that we need a new theory that is possible in the three dimensional world. I have one. Why not make the space-time fabric into cubes? You can put two objects on top of each other without breaking the rules of the fabric of space-time.  "But what if," you say, "you use it for larger objects, like the sun or the moon?" Well, good question. Let's use something much more dense. Let's use a black hole, the son of a hypernova. ( A hypernova is a type of supernova except it works with much larger stars. Also called, Type 2 supernovae. Oh, and supernovas or hypernovas both give birth to black holes). Now back to our story. 

    So, when the new view of the fabric of space-time meets something that has mass, The closer the fabric of space-time is to something that has mass, the more they bend. They, of course, bend into what the object looks like. Now let's use the black hole we were talking about. Since the black hole is in the shape of a sphere, the fabric of space-time will bend to the shape of a sphere. Oh, and I forgot to mention, they will also contract the closer they are to the object. So when a star gets near a black hole, the closer the star is, the more it gets attracted to the black hole. And the more it gets attracted, the more faster it goes, and so on. And my new theory works perfectly. I hope you agree with me, and if you don't please comment.

Email me at Tsegazeab12@gmail.com.
Thank you.

Is Infinity Possible?

                

                                              By: Tsegazeab Beteselassie

                                            

Infinity: The symbol of Infinity.

     Some people think infinity is possible. I, of course, agree with them, but not quite in the same way. Because, you see, I only agree with them in numerical terms. Numbers continue on forever, no beginning, no end. However, that is the only way infinity is possible. Lets take, for example, a black hole. Scientists say that it has infinite gravity, infinite mass, and an infinitely small singularity. But I disagree. None are infinite.

    First, the gravity isn't infinite. The reason why it isn't infinite is because if it was infinite, there would be infinite friction between the fabric of space-time to the point that it will boil, thus ripping away a portion of our universe, creating a new one which will be in the big bang period, and will have to wait 13.7 billion years to form moderate galaxies. But that's a different story. Also, infinite gravity means that the gravity will pull the universe together with infinite force into a singularity that will be destroyed because of one black hole. See what I mean, infinity isn't possible. Oh, also, once our universe gets destroyed, the infinite gravity of a black hole will go after the other universes, and since one of them has to have a black hole, they will form a supermassive black hole and destroy the multiverse. But there are millions, billions of black holes in our universe right? So we wouldn't be standing here right? See, no infinite gravity.

    Your probably wondering, "How about the infinite mass and infinite singularity"? Well, I got an awnser for that too. This time, we'll start with the mass. You see, if something has infinite mass, it is supposed to make an an infinitely sized well in the fabric of space-time. But that's not possible. The fabric of space-time is only for the universes, not the multiverse(s). That means our universe will technically turn into a well with things shooting toward it at the speed of light. But there is a problem with that too. A theory says, it takes an infinite amount of energy to accelerate something at the speed of light (besides a light beam). But that's not true.

Since you can make a light beam go faster than 180,000 miles per second, (the speed of light) we can use a proportion to solve this problem which is, Mass of light over speed of light equals Mass of object over x. You can easily see that it won't be infinite. So that means that the stars and beams of light and asteroids and galaxies and all the other things in the universe will shoot toward it at the speed of light or faster and incinerate. But are we incinerated yet? No. Are we rushing toward our doom faster than the speed of light toward a black hole which will probably destroy us in a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a millisecond? No. So that means the mass of the billions of black holes in the universe don't have infinite mass either. They only have a lot of mass that can destroy anything that comes to close to the singularity. And that brings us to our third topic.

  "What about the infinity small singularity" you might wonder. Well, I will awnser that in a moment. The infinity small singularity is impossible too. Imagine something infinitely small. None of us human beings can imagine something infinitely small. There is a reason why you can't do that. First, our brains are not equipped to think such things. But that's neuroscience. The second reason is that something can't be infinitely small because there is always a smaller size. Let's use the number line as an example. And lets say zero is the size of an hydrogen atom. There is a negative one right? That's a subatomic particle. and negative two and so forth. As I said before, in numerical terms, infinity is possible. So if the negative numbers are the subatomic particles, and numbers continue forever, that means there is always a smaller subatomic particle.

It's like infinity minus one.

     Now back to the black hole I mentioned about.  If what I said earlier is correct, this means that the "infinitely small" singularity is not infinite. However, if the singularity was infinitely small, the black hole would destroy itself and the suns and stars in our galaxy is orbiting a black hole with tremendous speed will hurtle with each other and destroy each other and I think you know that almost all the galaxies in the universe have a supermassive black hole in the middle and a lot of little black holes inside the galaxy that destroy stars, and, well I'll leave it to you to predict the effect. (If you can't predict what will happen, the awnser is, galaxies will crash with each other and destroy each other and leave a barren universe.) Oh, and for those of you who predicted what will happen, were not in that situation right now right? See? So no infinitely small singularity. All the infinite mass, gravity, and singularity were not infinite, only to the extreme extreme.

Email me at tsegazeab12@gmail.com 

Thank you.

Living in the Multiverse

      
                                                      By Tsegazeab Beteselassie

   In my last post, I explained how to enter the multiverse. Now I will show you how to repopulate it.
In the last article (or post if you will) , I mentioned the scientists and engineers that built it. They also have to have a crew with at least one female for reproduction. Once they had entered the multiverse, they have to find one similar like our own. this can happen by using a machine that shoots light faster than 180,000 miles per second. It will have to be infrared light, because it can detect heat. The machine will first, scan our universe to see how hot it is. Then, the human that is using it will search for a similar heat signature. When it finds one, it will alert the user and the human will tell the crew. After that, they will speed toward that certain spot billions times faster than the speed of light squared as shown in this picture.

Multiverses: The multiverses we may live in someday.

   The reason for this is because other universes are vast distances from each other and will take almost an infinite amount of time to get there at the speed of light. Of course this will take massive amounts of energy but it is solved by a gravity battery. The gravity battery will have a miniature black hole that is created by putting enormous amounts of pressure on the atoms needed. Once the atoms collapse, a artificial black hole is formed, a machine surrounds it and uses it's gravity to power the rockets in the space ship. When the gravity quality shrinks enough so that the machine can't take any more energy from the black hole, the machine "feeds" it enough atoms so that it generates energy again to power the rockets.

There is another machine beside it that produces antimatter. Here is how. The machine is a miniature atom collider and shoots protons at some metal at almost the speed of light. That will produce antimatter. Another part of the machine stabilizes the antimatter so that it can be controlled (with gravitational fields) and channels it to the gravity battery to produce extra energy for the rockets. After a few days, they will probably reach the multiverse. Then, they will have to create a hole in (the universe's) the fabric of space-time (like they did in their own universe) and pass through it. Then they have to find a planet like earth.

   The planet doesn't have to be exactly like earth, only needs clouds, a sun, hydrogen ( in space or in/on the planet), and any form of oxygen as long as there is a lot of it  (there is a machine that makes hydrogen and oxygen into water). Then, the crew will live there, take mind photos (human technology improved) and send them faster than the speed of light. Then, more space ships will come and repopulate the planet. This is my article on how to repopulate the multiverse.

Email me at Tsegazeab12@Gmail.com.
Thank you.