Multiple Infinites

                              By: Tsegazeab Beteselassie


 

    If any of you guys reading this have read my post, "Is Infinity possible?", (if you want to read it, click here) you probably realize that the concept, "infinity" isn't possible. At least, in non-numerable terms. However, when your dealing with numbers, there actually may be more than one infinity. How? Let me explain.

 



Multiple infinities: This is the multiple infinity.
Link: axiomamnesia.com 

    If you want proof of the multiple infinites, we can easily resort to simple math to find the proof.  Let's use multiplication as the proof. What is, infinity times two? The answer is, of course, infinity. But that infinity is different from the normal infinity. If the normal infinity is I, then infinity times two is 2I. But what is the difference between the two infinites? Well, since infinity goes on forever, and the casual theory is that infinity was always there. But that will mean that infinity times two and infinity is the same thing. And that will mean that it will break the math rule that multiplication is either getting bigger or smaller (0.5 times 2). Three times two isn't the same as three times three, or three times four. So we will have to revise our casual infinity theory.

Anti-Gravity

                                 By: Tsegazeab Beteselassie




Anti-gravity: One way an anti-gravity machine might work, by Dr.Yevgeny Podkletnov.
Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2159487.stm

    "What is anti-gravity*?", you might ask. Well, to put in on simple terms, anti-gravity is, well, the opposite of gravity. It is supposed to be a pushing force, but if you read my last post, (if you want to read it, click here) gravity is a pushing force. Then wouldn't anti-gravity be a pulling force? I have no idea. But if I am correct and anti-gravity is a pulling force, then there would have to be another force acting upon anti-gravity. As I mentioned in my last post, neutrinos push two objects together. Then wouldn't anti-neutrinos (I'm only calling them anti- because I don't know what they are made of, not because they are made of antimatter) push things apart? I don't know about that either. But if that was correct, then there must be at least twice the amount of matter we thought was in the universe. But there is a problem. Wouldn't gravity in a massive object be slowed down with all those anti-neutrinos?

The theory of Gravity

                            By: Tsegazeab Beteselassie



    The scientists of today have a problem. They made carefully checked equations for how much mass is in our galaxy. And they figured out one thing. Eighty percent of the mass in our galaxy is missing. "Where could all that mass go?" people wondered. But soon they figured where it went.





Le Sage's theory: Le Sage's theory of gravity.
Link: en.wikipedia.org
 



    There is dark matter and dark energy in our universe. And our galaxy has some too, that keeps it spinning. But, still, some mass is missing. But in 1748, a man named Le Sage had an answer. He purposed that there are particles that go through the earth and can act as gravity (we'll get to that later). But no one believed him and the theory wasn't widespread. Albert Einstein further killed the theory  with special and general relativity, as well as the space-time theory and  Le Sage's theory was forgotten. But Le Sage was right. Particles do go through the earth (but they were actually energy waves). They're called neutrinos. But the galaxy's dark energy, dark matter, matter is still isn't enough to make the galaxy spin as it does.

 

    The neutrinos we were talking about earlier actually have to do something with all this. Le Sage said that gravity was a pushing force. "How is gravity a pushing force?" you might wonder. Well, Le  Sage explained that, let's say you have a iron ball. When all those neutrinos attack the ball from all sides, the force on each part of the ball is the same as the other parts. The ball doesn't move. But what happens when there is two balls?

The New Sabertooth

             By: Tsegazeab Beteselassie



Sabertooth: The new Sabertooth.
Link: futureideas12.blogspot.com

    You know the Sabertooth Cat* right? It was the most powerful hunter of it's time. Yet, it has some weaknesses. Well I created a new species (in my mind) of Sabertooth Cats. They are bigger, stronger, faster, smarter, and overall more powerful than a average Sabertooth Cat. Well anyways, let's start with the Sabertooth's weaknesses.

   One of the Sabertooth's weaknesses is it's Sabers. They were thought to be used for hunting, until they discovered they were actually quite brittle and only used for shearing off meat. So I decided to make my Sabertooth's Sabers have a sturdier base. Also, their length can be a disadvantage so I made them shorter for even more sturdier teeth. The teeth are made normally, but are "immune" to microorganisms that rot your teeth. So far, we have fixed the teeth, but there is another weakness to the Sabertooth. It is it's legs.  

    Sabertooths are fast, but can't run fast for a long time. They have to ambush their prey so that they can survive. That's one of the reasons Sabertooths hunt in groups. But there is a way to fix that problem of its stamina. If you study the antinomy of a gazelles legs, (I hadn't) and combine it with the horses legs, you can get legs that have a lot of stamina, but are very fast. The stamina muscles cover the outside but speed muscles are with the bone. When speed muscles tire out, stamina muscles take over. Well, for now, we cleared most of the Sabertooth's weaknesses. Now, let's add some strengths.